Is Mitt Toooo Successful Even For GOP?

Tonight on Facebook, my lovely wife posted she's supporting former Governor Mitt Romney to be the Republican nominee for President of the United States. I understand why she's leaning Romney, and it's wasted air to argue just for argument's sake.

What does have me dazed and confused, however, are some of the comments and angles the candidates are taking, and perhaps moreover, what's firing up debate audiences and Republican Tweeps. I suppose I'll give examples in a short list form...

1) Apparently, Mitt Romney is too successful to be the nominee. Before folks can take their thoughts to step #2, they slay him on how much money he's made and how he made it. I just don't get this, especially coming from fired-up R's. I mean, WHO CARES?? As long as he did it legally, good for him. I actually applaud that a wildly successful person may be our leader. Am I missing something?

1a) Romney's tax returns. Last week, I thought it may be a good idea to release his tax returns. Sure, there's going to be a wild amount of "zeros" on there. Also, I'm sure to be envious. Obviously, there will be an offensively small tax rate applied, and/or offshore accounts present. Well, big deal. That's the way the system works at present. Fair? Probably not. Legal? Yes. Steve Jobs, Kobe Bryant, Bill Gates, and Jay-Z are probably in the same tax yacht, and none of them graduated from college. In short, we can get to that tax bracket too, and until someone changes the system, that's that.

Further, he's probably right when he tries to explain how Democrats will absolutely POUND on him if the numbers are published. D's would crucify him on the air, paving a way for the competition to victory. Who knows... but I get what he's saying.

2) Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich has crowds hypnotized. Newt's calm demeanor but pitbull bite on the media is great TV, and pumps the Twitter-sphere. However, this does not make him a "conservative," or "Reagan." I gotta type that Ronald Reagan, if nothing else on this earth, loved his wife to the core of his spirit. Who knows if Newt wanted an "open marriage," but I'm pretty confident cheating and divorce weren't in Reagan's heart. Reagan was loyal to the core to his second wife, Nancy. Jane Wyman was his first wife. The difference between Reagan and Gingrich is that Reagan did not cheat. Jane Wyman even called Reagan a great and honorable man when he died. They supposedly divorced because the death of their infant daughter (she died the day after she was born) proved to be too much for them to handle. This aaaalll said, I understand Newt may not have met a soul mate, as Reagan may have... which may make this unfair. However, those are the punches, aren't they?

Here's a ridiculous, quick, parallel spin: "I'm the Joe Montana of this group. I have two feet, favor my right hand, and run around if I have to in order to get things done, and get paid only because I produce. I was even in the stadium with him a few times while he did great things. I'm Montana-like, because I'm claiming it." With that statement, I can hear my colleagues laughing. Difference is, I don't hear SC Republicans laughing. Conversely, they're gulping it up. Oh well, so goes the political game of defining one's self. Well done Newt, I suppose.

Congressional ethics reports and millions made via positions contrary to his Contract with America well-documented, I'm astounded my Republican friends allow him to keep claiming the "Reagan/conservative" label.

Don't get me wrong, I happen to think Newt has the ability to do colossal things. In the meantime however, one can't just claim Reagan's conservative Yin on one end, when he's really a Yang that Reagan would likely be ashamed of.

Before the political universe leaves the Palmetto State, I wish they'd expand further on the Keystone pipeline, oil shale, and our future with China.

I'm starting to think there are so many debates, and the candidates talk so much about their past while simultaneously stomping each other, that it's become boring. Given this pattern and platform, Newt may have discovered that blowing anything he can find out of the water works pretty well here. I would've assumed SC Republicans were more savvy than to reward this, but perhaps Newt is on to something.

We'll see on Saturday!

GOP Pounded It Out @Myrtle Beach, SC

Last night many of us watched a fiery and entertaining SCGOP debate held in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. Many of the TV talking heads labeled last night's affair the best yet. Of the debates I've seen, I agree completely. The candidates went at it, and the moderators let them. The crowd was full of hard-core Republicans who were proud to be there, and even prouder that their state was in the national spotlight. Well done, Myrtle Beach and SCGOP.

The theme of the night was to pounce on front-runner, Mitt Romney... and pounce they did. For instance, Santorum had Romney in a steel-spiked trap regarding the voting rights of felons relating to an ad Romney is running. Santorum had him right where he wanted him, and you could see it in the body language. However, just as Santorum was about to throw a knock-out blow, Gov. Perry belted in loudly, interrupting... and stole the moment. It was a lukewarm topic, for sure, but awesome to watch unfold nonetheless.

Newt went off during the entire night, and played to the crowd in large fashion. He oddly but powerfully captures moments, and audiences continue to soak him up.

Ron Paul probably lost votes last night. Meat-eating Republicans don't want to hear his 'Squeeze the Charmin' foreign policy preachings, and when he stated we should all pay a 0% tax rate, that was "it." This might sound good on a microphone to some folks, but it's just not real. It was a, "C'mon, man" moment.

I'd love to throw my spin on the two hours, and would have a big time showcasing some of the VERY funny Tweets that flowed through the feed, but this would lead to an overwhelmingly long post. In short, if you like politics and policy, and a nice spar, last night's debate was good TV.

Did any of the candidates offer anything new? Not really. Conversely, they continued to talk about past accomplishments and pointed out their opponent's failures. Given the gravity of the situation and atmosphere, this was ok, and better than hearing the mind numbing/time wasting, "I'm conservative. I'm more Reagan." This theater was better than that, and I think we're all glad for it.

Oddly, I began this post fully intending to type about Romney's income tax disclosure situation. Oh well!... I suppose this leaves me with another blog opportunity. I'll take it!

Once again... well done, SCGOP. South Carolina was on a national stage last night, and it turned out to be a hit.

Downtown Columbia's Transactions...

Columbia's Closings: Dec. 15, 2011 - Jan. 15, 2012

Innovation and Hustle Are Good Things

Earlier this week, @Wesley Donehue, was named one of "2011's Top 50 Most Influential People," by Columbia's Business Monthly Magazine. I don't know this for sure, but my gut tells me he was surprised by this, and truly flattered. Admittedly, I forgot to blog about this local accolade. In the meantime, his firm was featured on the CBS Evening News, commenting on South Carolina's (First In The South) Republican primary

Over the last year or so, Wesley's brand has caught fire. He does political work for a spectrum of Republican candidates and provides, in my bias, a top-shelf product for his client list. This is obviously awesome, and his friends are anxious to watch him grow.

Fast forward to the reason for this post, and what award-giving folks are having a hard time projecting, is that he's putting a personal stamp on his profession (innovation, if you will). In short, Wesley is sort of "Blue Ocean'ing" the arena of political consulting. For example, at the time, Tweeting @JimDeMint, @SCGOP, and #sctweets was ahead of the game. Further, he was ahead of the curve w/Vlogging (and getting candidates to Vlog), TwitterBackgrounds.com, and Fundraiser7, among other things. Further still, "PubPolitics" has caught on locally, which I've enjoyed sponsoring a few times (50 bucks for the beer).

Like the real estate industry, the political consulting arena is an imperfect one as the scale slides with every micro-instance. That said, Wesley is doing a big job of what DonehueDirect's tagline proclaims, "We Innovate Politics." His label is spot on with what he's trying to do, and is propelling his brand accordingly.

If you can't tell, this stuff is right up my alley...

Well done, @WesleyDonehue.

GOP PrimeTime Enters South Carolina

Now that Iowa and New Hampshire have come and gone, our South Carolina is now the center of the political universe. If you don't like politics or negative ads, I strongly suggest you unplug every communicative device in your world.

While the negative ads will get as nasty as creative minds (and the law) will allow, the candidates will try to stay positive in person and when on a microphone. While the TV commercials do the dirty work, the positive stump and interviews will consist of two basic topics that they think you want to hear: "Reagan, Reagan, Ronald Reagan, Conservative, Conservative, Conservative... Ronald Reagan, Conservative, I'm like Reagan, I'm Conservative... Conservative... Reagan. Reagan. Reagan." You get the idea.

Reagan. :)

Three thoughts come to mind, and I'll type as if I was talking to the candidates: 1) Stop trying to be someone you're not. When you mention Reagan, again and again, and again and again, you're diluting yourself. How good can you be, when ALL you aspire to be is someone else? 2) You all wanna be the same man! Compounded further, you want to be the same man over and over and over and over and over and over. 3) Since you say the same thing, you're wasting microphone time... and then it's gone. Congratulations, you just said the same thing as the fella beside you.

What I'm getting at is, the use of President Reagan's name has become white noise. The same could be argued about the term "conservative." OK already... we get it! It's going to be interesting one day when a Tea-Partier asks a question on national TV something to the effect of, "President Reagan raised the debt ceiling, raised taxes, and maybe traded a little boom-boom under the table (Ollie North). How do you parallel?"

I kinda think this is why Herman Cain was doing so well. With his 9-9-9 thing, he actually was saying sooooomething, while everyone else just said the same ole', same ole' "I'm conservative like Reagan" thing. I mean seriously, Rick Santorum's sweater vest even got traction because no one is saying anything new.

This all said, I'm well aware I'm not a political consultant. I also understand that when candidates say "Reagan" or "conservative," the dials get a bump in the focus groups. On this one, however, I'm not sure I care. Since they all say the same thing (with the exception of maybe Romney, sometimes), I contend the candidates are wasting microphone time.

It would be awesome if a candidate would shout something like, "I propose we tweak daylight saving's time," or "$5,000,000 commission to the first person that can efficiently find a way to convert oil shale into oil, or salt water into fresh, or make a fail-safe long-lasting battery and change the auto world forever." I dunno, just something.

I'm not sure why I started typing about this. Perhaps it's because I know we're about to get pounded with presidential politics, and hoping we'll have some good days of something more than the same old stuff we've heard for 20+ years.

Like Sen. Lloyd Bentsen calmly told Sen. Dan Quayle in a debate some years ago: "Senator, you're no Jack Kennedy." Well, candidates, you're no Ronald Reagan. Be yourself!!! You might surprise it, and then perhaps you'll be like Reagan.

Former Tour Of Homes @ King's Grant!

Stunner @ King's Grant Hits Columbia's Market
At over 4600 sq/ft., 66 Somerton may be the largest King's Grant home I've listed since Hobonny Lane. With four large beds and four full baths, this is a serious house with a ton of cool amenities.

From former posts regarding homes in King's Grant, you know too well that most inventory in this neighborhood feature one or two gathering areas. 66 Somerton sports four or five. As you can see from the pics in the link, this house possesses the expected formals PLUS two huge areas replete with space and luxury... one of which is surrounded with gorgeous windows. To put it in perspective, you could pretty much have a premier sports/wine bar at this address.

66 Somerton also comes with an awesome private gunite pool, and back up to woods that provides for coveted privacy. In short, this is an entertainment mecca... at all levels.

Further still, the spacious owner's suite contains TWO (2!) full private baths. How cool is that???

Call or email fjones@cbunited.com or amandaqpayne@live.com if you or anyone you know would like to view this beautiful King's Grant home.

This one has some good stuff...

Columbia's Last HotSheet Of The Year!

Columbia, SC's Newest MLS Listings: December 2011
Thank goodness it's "HotSheet" time!!!, as I apparently broke a little rule with my last post. After the Gamecocks big bowl win, I posted a great photo of Spurrier receiving his victory douse. As no foul was intended, the photographer wasn't thrilled about me using his copyrighted image. That said, he was classy about the situation and asked that it be removed, or I'd be sent a bill. Again, no harm no foul, as I promptly removed the photo. To be sure, it was a great shot of a truly happy team and coach. I'm sure you'll see it around town, or somewhere else on the Internets.

Fast forward to the HotSheet. December's edition includes a good mix of inventory between $150,000 and $300,000. Interestingly, while scrolling through the homes, I noticed Amanda and I represent three of the highest priced listings on December's list (Doesn't matter one bit, but still kinda fun!). Davant Place, Canterbury, and Dandridge are all top shelf properties, and we're proud to market these fine homes.

Have fun clicking and scrolling through the last Hotsheet of 2011!